Playing the Finger Violin.
|
The violin form of the wooden laminae in the finger violin is not acoustically motivated, but a purely scenic point, which made me excited to research the scenic side of the musical performance more, especially in my solo playing. For many audiences, this side is more important than the musical one! I also started to mix with poetry, acting and objects in my concerts.
The Veloncell Marcel.
|
My first electric instrument, which also has some electro-acoustic possibilities, turned out to be a celebration of the 80th anniversary of the first ready-made by Marcel Duchamp: "bicycle wheel" from 1913 (which I was unaware of - just like I was unaware of that it was the 100th anniversary of the Ferris Wheel). It is a copy of the same constellation of a bicycle wheel sitting on the front fork stuck through the seat of a kitchen stool, with one important addition: it still has the dynamo left. I attached the electric wires to a plug and could bring out the unadulterated sound of the power generator through loudspeakers. It is a very strong signal which put an end to a fuse in my stereo at first attempt. Later, when I made a parallel coupling with the sound signal and the attached bicycle lights, the sound signal was reliefed a bit, and at the same time I got a nice light effect when playing on the dynamo! One acoustic possibility is to play the spokes, e.g. with a double bow - two violin bows put together with the horsehair in different directions (which I made to play two saws at the same time). Another possibility is to let the spinning spokes strike different materials. A contact microphone in the hub even amplifies details like the scraping of a comb on the fork. I also added a table-lamp spring in the wheel which gives a bass drone and various scraping. The name of this instrument is veloncell Marcel.
The Brillolin.
|
The brillolin is a further development of the hedgehog. The fingerholder is here formed like a miniature violin, where the protruding part, in two "floors" from top and bottom, comes from where the violin neck would be (later, the upper floor broke). Instead of wooden sticks, there are pieces of piano wire coming out, and additionally, two strings are placed between fingerholder and an empty pair of glasses that the musician wears on his or her face. ("Briller" means glasses in Norwegian.) The origins of the instrument is the finding of the empty glasses, which I thought had a comical quality which ought to be used in an instrument.
The Lamp Shade Bells.
|
On an abandoned industry I found 22 well sounding lamp-shades of glass. I took them home, sorted them according to pitch, and made a simple stand for these glass shade bells with 6 shades. Unfortunately, the 22 rapidly turned out to reduce its number during transportations, so not many extras remain today.
My repertoire of over 30 instruments and sound tools lead to a puttering about that I want to alter with a kind of one-man band which combines bowed idiophones (saw and bowed sheet and rods of metal and wood), strings, percussion and wind instruments. I have continuously revised the outline of this instrument, till I made a full-size cardboard model and gave it the name crow castle.
In a dream, I have now seen a flute which is also a two-stringed bowed instrument. The finger board of the string instrument coincides with the body of the flute. A normal descending scale on the flute would result in an ascending one on the string instrument! A related bass version with a plastic tube didjeridoo and strings waits to be made.
In waked state, I have approached the road to the one-man band by playing several instruments at once: didjeridoo, piano and saw; two saws at once; finger violin and stringed stirrups etc.
Another of my waiting projects will be to build a boat that can hang freely in the air in piano wires, e.g. under bridges. The musician will stand in the hanging boat. This vision might have been inspired by my childhood reading of Jules Verne's Lord of the Air.
3. Death of prejudice.
This story is not finished - I collect and search for sounds everywhere; look for, meet and read about instrument inventors; try the sound potential of lamp-shades, household utensils, tools, pots, balloons, junk and body parts; bang, rub, knock, sing through time and matter. I feel closer to my nature, and to nature, in irregular rhythms, uncertain pitches, uncontrollable timbres and indefinable squeaking - but also with variations, contrasts against these. All or no sounds are strange or unusual - but only some have the character of discovery or revelation - what interests, inspires me most is the communication, identity, truth, openness with the context in which I meet the sound. I sometimes feel richer when I am not the whole factor of power, in the encounter with image, word, others playing or dancing, in a bigger context.
To be able to improvise freely and communicate with other musicians in the moment, it helps to leave behind sounds that tend to refer to an inner structural hierarchy, such as functional tonal harmony and regular rhythm. These willingly demand their own attention. To completely leave their commonly prevailing supremacy leaves the musicians naked in front of each other with their bodies' impulsive life and leaps between strength, weakness, rest and intensity. To leave the traditionally goal-oriented drama with its one-way time sequence demands an electric attention to the whole rather than on one's own part, which almost automatically seems to lead to short, fast contributions, pauses and sharp changes. The better the communication, the bigger the tension and unpredictability, since the intensive listening automatically opens for the inexhaustible curiosity and desire to experiment which is always brooding behind the "presentable". "Communication" is in this case something other than "dialogue" or "conversation". A better simile would be that every participating musician and sound are poetical elements that connect sparks between each other in analogies, above the logic of the conversation. I conceive this as a surrealist state of mind.
To present a sound drama with a predetermined solution through functional tonal harmony or regular rhythm is what is usually identified as music. Without openness for crime, this corresponds to a way of thinking which grants the highest value to the functional and regular. The reaction of fear and repression against threatening crisis is to confront chaos with order. What is needed of the human spirit and body is to confront the orders of realism and adjustment with inspired and unbridled chaos, but also to try new and other orders - orders that arise from the chaos that human desire at the first glance seems to be. Both of these ways have been opened in music by e.g. free improvisation and instrument invention. This is not something new but has always been the case, before the music became ordered, in the now prevailing sense of "composed" - but the sight has often been dimmed by musicians having become content with, or found honor in, style making, fame or positions. There is no unified movement and there is no purity in any sense. Every honest and curious musician is a lonely example: François Bayle, Anthony Braxton, John Coltrane, Sven-Åke Johansson, Spike Jones, Thomas Magee, Phil Minton, Conlon Nancarrow, Hal Rammel, Jon Rose, Giacinto Scelsi, LaDonna Smith, Sun Ra, Cecil Taylor, Karl-Erik Welin, Christian Werner, Lasse Werner or Davey Williams (to just mention a few of those standing close enough to me or at a far distance enough) ... in relation to each other very different in temperament, style (and fame) but all alike in their release of strong powers of chaos from which new poetic orders arise, orders that show that not only music but all life can be lived in so many more, and more beautiful ways than what the law and habit command.